Unveiling the complex nexus of potentiality and facticity in our society
THROUGHOUT OUR history, a recurring pattern can be observed in the prevalence of societal problems. One notable instance is the tendency of our voters to repeatedly elect the same individuals into positions of power. This phenomenon raises profound questions about the persistence of voter behavior and the lack of substantial change in the political landscape. Furthermore, crimes and corruption persistently afflict our society, despite concerted efforts to combat them. The government has implemented numerous laws in an attempt to address these issues, yet they persist in various insidious forms.
These recurring patterns highlight the need for a deeper understanding of the underlying factors contributing to these societal ills. It is imperative that we delve into the root causes and explore innovative solutions to break free from this cycle of stagnation.
A crucial element in Martin Heidegger's philosophy, particularly in his work "Being and Time," is his notion of facticity and potentiality. His concept offers valuable insights into the understanding of recurring social problems. He defined facticity as the way in which a person's existence is predetermined by historical, cultural, and societal causes. On the other side, potentiality describes a person's ability to envision possibilities and live an authentic life.
Our nationality as Filipinos is an inherent truth that we cannot alter. Furthermore, our collective experiences, shaped by the events and traditions of our past, contribute to our facticity. This includes elements of our culture, language, and customs that have been passed down through generations.
The recurrence of electing the same individuals and the enduring prevalence of crimes and corruption in our society raise an important question: are these phenomena to be regarded as facticities? In other words, should we accept them as indisputable truths that define us and our society?
It is important to acknowledge that facticity does not absolutely imply passivity or predetermination. Following Heidegger’s thinking, we are not bound to vote for the same individuals during elections or to tolerate crimes and corrupt practices within our society. It is crucial to understand that our choices and actions are not predetermined by external factors. We possess the power to make independent decisions, including selecting different candidates during elections and actively opposing criminal activities and corruption in our communities. By recognizing this, we empower ourselves to break free from any perceived constraints and take responsibility for shaping a better society.
We should not be complacent or resigned to the belief that we are insignificant players in a predetermined game. Heidegger's advice to transform the existing conditions of our society into opportunities is to shift our mindset and unleash our transformative power. We possess the ability to challenge the prevailing norms, elect leaders based on well-informed decisions, and support the government in eliminating crimes and corruption. By taking these actions, we can actively contribute to the development of a society that upholds integrity, fairness, and progress. (RBT)
No comments:
Post a Comment